Archive for the ‘Mortgages’ Category

If You Have A Mortgage You Need To Read This

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

If You Have A Mortgage You Need to Read This

September 8, 2010 is quickly approaching and represents the next scheduled increase in the Bank of Canada Prime Rate. Currently at 2.75% can we expect an increase to 3.00%? Could it be more?

 If you have a variable rate mortgage should you be concerned?

The past several weeks have seen a gradual decrease in fixed mortgage rates. We are funding 5 year fixed terms at 3.59%. Will an increase in the prime rate (or a threat of an increase) trigger fixed rates to increase? It did several months ago and history has a way of repeating itself.

If you have a current mortgage with an interest rate over 4% you should contact us immediately at bsmith@casbmanagementgroup.com and ask for a no cost review of your situation. If you wait it might be too late, as we don’t expect these mortgage rates to last.

We welcome your comments.

Marketing 101

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

There is one marketing truth you must understand: People buy when they are ready to buy, not when you are ready to sell. So, just because your lead is not ready to buy today, doesn’t mean they aren’t important. After all, today’s leads are tomorrow’s customers, or next month’s or next year’s. Treating your leads like existing customers ensures they will come directly to you once they are ready to buy. Since I am in the business of essentially selling “money” I figure it is a product everyone eventually will need. The trick is in “reminding” people that I am still alive, still in business, and still anxious to help them achieve their goals.

New Mortgage Rules – Separating the fact from the fiction

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

I was speaking to one of our lenders last week and suggested that he send me a summary of all the changes happening in the Canadian residential mortgage market. He said he would once they figured it all out. I found that amusing given the Minister’s press conference was back on February 16, 2010. It has taken two months to sort it out, but here is a brief summary of the changes. If you would like to call me to discuss in more detail I would be happy to do so.

  • Refinances: The maximum LTV has been reduced from 95% to 90%
  • Non-owner occupied rentals: The maximum LTV has been reduced from 95% to 80%. Lenders may require these mortgages be insured if over 65% LTV
  • Qualification rate: For loans with a greater LTV than 80%, the qualifying interest rates used to calculate Gross Debt Service ratio (GDS) and Total Debt Service ratio (TDS) are:

–       On a fixed term of 5 years or more: The ‘contract rate’ (the rate offered in the contract)

–       On a fixed term of less than 5 years and on all variable rates: The greater of the contract rate, or the benchmark rate (5-year conventional rate, published by the Bank of Canada)

  • Rental income (subject property): The new formula for calculating TDS determines the borrower’s gross annual income based on 50% of gross rental income from the subject property instead of the previous 80% of gross rental income from all rental properties
  • Rental income (other properties): If the borrower has other non-owner occupied, rental-income generating residential properties, then:

–       Net rental income can be included in the borrower’s income; and,

–       PITH (principle, interest, taxes, and heating) for these properties can be excluded from the debt service costs.

 

  • Business for self: Maximum of two units where one is owner occupied. 90% LTV on purchases, 85% LTV on refinances. “Stated income” is accepted, but commission income is ineligible.

 

April 27, 2010 is the annual LSTAR Annual Trade Show at the Best Western Lamplighter Inn in London, Ontario. We hope you all drop by our booth and enter our contest. If you mention your read this article you will receive a second chance to win. It is always nice when life gives you a “do over”, and you thought this only happened on the golf course.

The Change In Mortgage Rules Not Being Talked About

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

With all the focus and media attention given recently to changes in the mortgage rules, one very important change went virtually unnoticed and this change will have a significant impact on self employed mortgage applicants. Effective April 9, 2010 the loop hole that allowed the self employed to purchase property based on “stated” income versus “proven” income is essentially closed, with limited exceptions. The “stated” income product used for qualifying purposes was widely used, given the propensity for the self employed to show minimum personal income for tax purposes. The self employed will now need traditional third party validation of income.

This change along with those previously mentioned in my blog, How Do The New Mortgage Rules Affect You? www.casbmanagementgroup.com/blog will have a substantial impact on the local real estate market. Fewer individuals eligible to qualify for mortgages will result in a softening real estate market.

We welcome your comments.

How Do The New Mortgage Rules Affect You?

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

 

I am writing this just minutes after Jim Flaherty’s February 16, 2010 press conference and typically I now have more questions than answers. I makes me nervous when the government feels they need to intervene to protect citizens from themselves. Call me a cynic, but here are the three points to the plan, the intent behind it and the questions I have:

1.      All borrowers must meet the standard for a five-year fixed rate mortgage regardless of mortgage type or term. Currently the standard is the three-year rate, which is historically less than the five year term. The intent of the change is to make Canadians qualify at the higher rate so that they can actually make payments at the higher rate should interest rates rise.  In effect, they would now qualify to purchase smaller homes then they would have previously qualified for.  My question: What happens when someone needs to refinance, can afford the “actual” mortgage payments, yet cannot qualify for financing under the “theoretical” five year mortgage rate? Do they lose their home?

 

2.      The maximum Canadians can withdraw when refinancing their mortgage is 90% of the value of their home down from 95%. The intent is for Canadians to maintain some equity in their home if real estate prices drop and also to encourage Canadians to pay down their mortgages. My question: If Canadians are refinancing to consolidate debt, why would you force them to potentially carry 5% of additional credit card or other higher interest debt over what a mortgage solution would afford?

 

3.      A 20% down payment will be required for non-owner-occupied properties purchased for speculation. The intent is to make it more difficult for average Canadians to use real estate as a wealth generating strategy, in order to protect them from risky speculation and artificially driving up housing prices. My question: Does this policy apply to 2nd homes such as cottages?  My rant: How nice for our government to tilt the real estate playing field in favour of the rich.

 

These new rules are to take effect April 19, 2010 but you can bet that lenders will begin to react immediately.  Fortunately these policy changes will open the door of opportunity for some as it closes the door for others. Please take this time to review how these changes might affect you or your clients moving forward, and then call me to discuss your best strategy to take advantage of the new policies.

We welcome your comments

Bankruptcy Made Easy? Are you part of the problem?

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

If I hear another cute radio commercial promoting how bankruptcy could be the solution to stopping annoying creditor calls or to consolidate debt into “one easy payment” I believe I am going to pull out what’s left of my hair.

How irresponsible – not to mention immoral – to council clients to simply shirk their responsibilities and essentially screw over the people that have provided them financing. But Bruce you might be thinking, bad things can happen to good people. Can’t we give them a fresh start? Who are they really hurting? Only the big corporations who can afford the losses?

The problem I have with these bankruptcy “professionals” is their view that a short term gain is in the best interest of their clients. (It is certainly in the trustee’s best interest). What about the long term pain? What happens when they want to purchase a home at some time in the future? It’s funny but bankruptcy with all the negative stereo types attached to it is actually not the worst option for the client.

 A bankruptcy will show on a client’s credit bureau for seven years after filing and six years after discharge, but lenders will generally give favourable consideration to clients who have spotless re-established credit for two years post bankruptcy discharge,  in effect clients are given a second change. Declare bankruptcy a second time however and it remains for 14 years on the credit bureau and lenders will have little interest in dealing with these clients. Make no mistake, bankruptcy is a poor solution and should be avoided.

So what is worse than a bankruptcy? A credit proposal. The problem with a credit proposal is that lenders treat them like a bankruptcy but there is generally no quick resolve and discharge, so the proposal remains on the credit bureau for a much longer period of time. It is in effect, a bankruptcy that never ends.

So what is worse than a credit proposal?  A power of sale judgement.  Clients that default on their mortgage payments will ultimately have power of sale procedures taken against them. This stays on the credit bureau for seven years as well. The reason this is poorest solution is that number one, lenders don’t want to lend to clients that have screwed them over personally (or another financial institution.) The second reason is that this process, in most cases, is 100% avoidable by simply listing the home for sale. Duh.

I am amazed at the number of power of sale properties that are listed every day with clients walking away from equity. Properties that cannot be listed and sold through traditional methods can be sold privately and often provide the client the possibility of remaining in the property as a tenant, with an option to repurchase the property at some point in the future. Does that not sound like the best solution for all concerned?

If you are faced with the prospect of a client approaching power of sale, a credit proposal, or bankruptcy  ask yourself this question. Are you part of the problem or part of the solution? Give us a call. We can help.

 

We welcome your comments.

Bank of Canada backs off housing bubble talk

Monday, January 11th, 2010

 

I see that the Bank of Canada has backed off their earlier position in respect to mortgage rates as per my previous blog.

In a speech in Edmonton, bank official David Wolf ruled out increasing interest rates to discourage mortgage lending.

Wolf, an adviser to bank governor Mark Carney, said that in the central bank’s view it is premature to be talking about a housing bubble in Canada.

“We see the housing market requiring vigilance, not alarm,” he said.

He added that even if the bank was convinced housing prices were getting out of hand, raising interest rates would be too blunt an instrument, since it would mean cooling off all economic activity.

“We would, in essence, be dousing the entire Canadian economy with cold water, just as it emerges from recession,” he said in a speech delivered on behalf of deputy governor Timothy Lane, who could not travel to the Alberta capital for personal reasons.

“As a result, it would take longer for economic growth to return to potential and for inflation to get back to target,” he added.

Wolf said the bank considers the current hot market to be a phenomenon based on temporary factors, such as pent-up demand from the recession, and low mortgage rates. Moreover, he noted with starts below long-term demographic requirements, the number of houses on the market is still declining.

Better ways to cool market

Wolf, a former chief economist with Merrill Lynch Canada, said there are better ways to cool the housing market.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has also mused about such measures, including raising the minimum down payment requirement above five per cent, or reducing the maximum length a house can be amortized from the current 35 years.

The bank has been highlighting for months the danger of Canadians getting in over their heads in purchasing homes, warning that buyers should ensure they don’t take on too much debt.

The bank’s worry is that homeowners with large mortgages that are manageable now with interest rates at record lows won’t be able to afford their monthly payments once interest rates start rising, as is expected later this year.

On the economy as a whole, Wolf said the bank believes the economic recovery is still dependent on government support and that “growth drive by the private sector has yet to materialize.”

Notes from the speech were posted on the bank’s website.

With files from The Canadian Press

Are you ready for higher mortgage rates?

Thursday, January 7th, 2010


December was a vibrant month for real estate sales in London and I have to admit being taken by surprise. Are we not facing record unemployment rates and a huge trade deficit? Perhaps the unemployment benefits have not yet expired? Low interest rates, the rush to beat the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) and of course people like me, qualifying buyers that can’t qualify at their local bank branch, have added to the stimulus, but what happens when interest rates increase, as Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has suggested in the third quarter of 2010? He is also considering reducing amortization periods and increasing the down payment required on homes if the housing market shows excessive demand.
The Chamber of Commerce is already predicting a 3% increase in the prime rate by the end of 2011. What would that mean to buyers and those needing to refinance? At today’s prime rate of 2.25% it would cost $1,275 to carry a $300,000 home with an amortization of 25 years and a 5 per cent down payment. By comparison, a 5.25% mortgage rate would mean the $300,000 home would now cost $1,745 every month, or an additional $470 per month. That’s a lot of extra money to be shelling out, especially if you’re not expecting rate increases. Not only will mortgage rate increases reduce the number of potential buyers able to qualify,  rate increases of this magnitude will create a greater supply of homes for sale, that owners quite simply, no longer can afford. Some analysts estimate as many as 10 per cent of households risk losing a home if the Bank of Canada rate rises to just 4.5 per cent. So how does this all affect you? Will the housing market collapse? Just how bad will it be? Will you be searching for a new career?
The cost of carrying a mortgage will absolutely shoot higher in the next few years. Nothing is more certain, so let’s get you prepared. On the other hand I see nothing in our future that suggests a rapid increase. Our dollar will be at par, so manufacturing will still be suffering. The U.S. economy will continue to be a mess, with wars to fund and a massive deficit. What exactly is Jim Flaherty seeing as this economic boom that will require higher interest rates to control inflation?
Please let me know your thoughts as your insights would be appreciated. Also there is no need to change careers, as the sharp realtors do just fine in every market… as do the sharp money guys.

 

 

 

 

The 7 Most Common Mortgage Mistakes

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

Based on my experience here are the 7 most common mortgage mistakes made by home buyers. Mistakes can cost you thousands of dollars. Fortunately our clients are exempt from these pitfalls.

1.       Overextending Yourself

Realtors often encourage buyers to purchase the most house they can afford, based on their ability to qualify. In a low interest rate market this can be very tempting. What happens however when that 3.75% five year mortgage jumps to 5.75% at renewal time. Can you afford a 50% increase in your monthly payments? Having a monthly payment that you are comfortable with, will give you peace of mind now and in the future.

 

2.       Discounting The Cost Of Bad Credit

Having poor credit not only makes it more difficult to qualify for a mortgage, you could be subjected to much higher interest rates or a larger down payment. Your habit of not honouring your financial commitments on time will end up costing you thousands in preventable interest payments. If you want to qualify for the best rates, pay your bills on time and don’t max out your credit facilities.

 

3.       Not Knowing Your Down Payment Options

Do you have the typical minimum 5% down payment required? If not, do you have an investment that could be cashed in? First time home buyers or those not owning a home for five years can tap into RRSP’s with no penalty. Do you have the ability to borrow the 5%? Do you know of a relative that will gift it to you? Will the vendor of the house you are purchasing assist you? Can you sell another asset like a vehicle? Get creative.

 

4.       Not Budgeting For Closing Costs

Transfer, tax, legal fees, title insurance, interest adjustments, appraisal fees, home inspections, home insurance and property taxes are examples of the type of additional expenditures you may need to incur before during or after closing on your home. A good rule is to budget 1.5% of your purchase price for legal and transfer taxes. Appraisals and home inspections will run in the $250-$300 range. Make sure you have accumulated these funds as well as your down payment, to avoid any surprises and disappointment.

 

5.       Not Getting Pre –Approved

There is nothing worse than finding the home you want and then finding out you cannot afford it. This wastes your time, your realtor’s time and lowers your enthusiasm when you are still thinking about those nicer homes you saw, but can’t afford. The pre-approval also shortens the time required to obtain your actual mortgage approval and allows you to lock into today’s rates now, should they increase during your search.

 

6.       Not Choosing The Right Mortgage Product

When it comes to getting a mortgage, there are a number of products and options to choose from including fixed rate, variable rate, interest only, open, closed, long term, short term, various amortization schedules, etc. Choosing the product that is best for you may be the most important financial decision you ever make. A mortgage is not only a mortgage; it is the corner stone of your financial and retirement plan. Given its importance, it is funny how most financial planners rarely talk about it. Reviewing these mortgage options with an unbiased mortgage agent -such as myself- could save you thousands of dollars.

 

7.       Believing The Bank Is Your Friend.

The bank is not your friend. The banks make millions of dollars off of unsuspecting consumers who simply don’t know of a better way to get a mortgage. Need proof? Have you ever renewed a mortgage with a bank? You will receive a letter in the mail asking you to select one of their current mortgage options, return the letter by the specific date and you are done. Simple right? Unfortunately the rates offered are not the best available in the marketplace, and no one has taken the time to review how the new mortgage fits into your overall financial plan. Unfortunately most people simply return the letter. The banks know this and that’s why they do it. At no cost to you, we shop the market to find the best lender, the best mortgage product, the best available rates, terms and an amortization schedule that fits your budget. Call or email today and we can get started in helping you towards a better financial future.

 

We welcome your comments.

Homes you can buy with a credit card

Friday, June 19th, 2009

I got the idea for this blog from a Forbes magazine article. As the title suggest you can purchase real estate throughout Canada and the United States using your credit card. I am not suggesting this is the route to go given the higher interest rates associated with credit cards or unsecured credit lines over traditional mortgages, but in theory if you possessed a credit card with say a maximum limit of $100,000 you could take out a cash advance and buy that property outright with no financing required. Check your local MLS listings for properties under $100,000 and you will be surprised by the availability in today’s marketplace. Even in major urban centers like the GTA, apartment style condo’s can be found for under $60,000.

We welcome your comments.